Some days a light goes off and you
begin to see things in a different way. Today is one of those days.
For too long we have argued over who was what politically. The
Democrats say they are doing what's best for the country, while the
Republicans and libertarians say the same. Sometimes we get so
wrapped up in party we forget to think. There is a simple solution.
We are all interventionist or
non-interventionist. It doesn't matter if it's social politics or
foreign events, the terms can be applied. Can it be this cut and dry?
Can we be an interventionist on some thing and a non-interventionist
on others? Remember the age old adage “Mind your own business.”
Our ancestors have passed those wise words along through the ages.
The non-interventionist is simply the same thing.
The interventionist often uses the
power of government to do their bidding. They don't want other people
to eat certain foods so they elect people who are also
interventionist. Interventionist believe most people aren't capable
of self governance. There are some people who are, and will always
be, dependent on others. Even a non-interventionist believes in
helping those who ask for help. The interventionist doesn't wait for
them to ask for help, but forces help on those in need as well as
those who aren't.
Some of us have been looking for a way
to bring like minded people together, but find that difficult because
of labels and misguided perceptions. I find that I agree with
Democrats on many things. We even occasionally agree on the best
solution. It's because of labels that we cannot find enough common
ground on which to work effectively, even though all political
persuasions agree that government is broke.
In the end it comes down to those who
want more government and those who want less. There are those who
believe government is more efficient than private industry, while
others see the opposite. No matter if it's government or private
interest, I think most can agree we don't want them in our lives. We
don't want government or business intervening in our lives. Because
we can agree on this, we find that Democrat, Republican, and
libertarian can be non-interventionists.
lib·er·al
1. open to new behavior or opinions and
willing to discard traditional values.
"they have more liberal views
toward marriage and divorce than some people"(of education)
concerned 2. mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and
experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
con·serv·a·tive
1. holding to traditional attitudes
and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in
relation to politics or religion.
2. a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.
2. a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.
re·pub·li·can
1. (of a form of government,
constitution, etc.) belonging to, or characteristic of a republic.
advocating or supporting
republican government.
"the republican
movement"
2. a person advocating or supporting republican government.
lib·er·tar·i·an
2. a person advocating or supporting republican government.
lib·er·tar·i·an
1. an adherent of libertarianism.
"libertarian philosophy"
a person who advocates civil
liberty.
2. Philosophy: a person who believes in the doctrine of free will.
pro·gres·sive
1. happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
"a progressive decline in
popularity"
2. (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
2. (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
"a relatively progressive
governor"
3. a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
3. a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer,
reformist, liberal, libertarian More
Above are all the defined political terms. At first look we might say they point out the differences, but I see many similarities. For example no one wants the country to not grow. Everyone wants it to move forward. I remember learning about the founders the liberals were for building the republic and wanting a free populous. Look at John Locke who founded liberalism, yet today there is a conservative leaning foundation named for him.
Labels and their meanings have changed
over the decades. Those with socialist and communist beliefs have
hijacked some of the labels and parties. That's why we might be
simplifying things by simply looking at everything in two ways,
interventionist or non-interventionist. Which are you?
No comments:
Post a Comment