When the Social Security Act of 1935 was first created by the
government, it was a well intended program. When you have politicians
involved, even the best intentions often have disastrous consequences.
From the beginning social security took monthly contributions-taxes- and
paid the recipients. By law any excess revenues must be placed in
special-issue, non-marketable Treasury bonds. Essentially, that is the
federal government loaning itself money. The Treasury bonds goes into
Social Security and the actual money is spent in the general budget.
It is true that by being in the form of bonds, these assets-I
use that word loosely- do gain interest, most often less than 2%. What
even the most educated fail to tell you is that this is not truly an
asset, but a debt. By turning those excess dollars into treasury bonds,
the government could take Social Security funds and spend them any place
they wish.
Over decades the Social Security trust has been shuffled around. For
the sake of space, time, and understanding, I will reduce the movements
to simply these:
1- Social Security was off-budget from 1935-1968;
2- On-budget from 1969-1985;
3- Off-budget from 1986-1990, for all purposes except computing the deficit.
4- Off-budget for all purposes since 1990.
We often find the treasury bills in the account used to show a
surplus. It’s my belief that, in part, is how Clinton balanced the
budget. When counting debt the Clinton, as well as past administrations,
counted only publicly held debt. They use an accounting procedure that
counts internal debt as assets, even though the government owes itself.
If you checked out the Clinton surplus on factcheck.org you would
find it’s true, when in fact it’s false. I find it impossible to call
loaning yourself money an asset. The only place in which to trade those
bonds for US dollars is the government itself.
We have heard people say for decades the Social Security trust fund
is full of IOUs, which it is, since it’s filled with only debt, Treasury
bonds. Obama essentially admitted this when he said, “If the debt
ceiling isn’t raised, I can’t promise those social security checks will
go out on the third.” Since there are the monthly receipt of Social
Security, and other taxes, those payments can easily be made. If the
trust fund was as full of money as the Democrats claim, paying
recipients wouldn’t have even been mentioned. We continuously hear how
Social Security is solvent until 2017-35, the date is constantly
changing. I believe 2017 is the most likely date.
Currently there is enough taxes coming into the Social Security fund
to make monthly payments. As baby-boomers continue to retire, eventually
those receipts won’t cover the payments and the Treasury will have to
begin buying back those bonds. Unless current debt is resolved, and the
economy improved so more tax revenue can be collected, the program will
go down in flames on the backs of seniors. Taxing the so-called rich
will not solve the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment